interpersempre.com

After the first leg: As usual, it was up to Juve to save Italy's honour.

 Last night: Show us who you really are.  Ianquinta: "We'll intimate Inter."

‘Resign Blanc & Secco’ Chant Juventus Fans Following Europa League Exit To Fulham

A group of Juventus fans at Craven Cottage have reacted to their team’s humiliating Europa League exit against Fulham by demanding that president Jean Claude Blanc and transfer chief Alessio Secco resign.

The nine-man Bianconeri were thrashed 4-1 in west London to lose 5-4 on aggregate, with goals from Zoltan Gera (2), Bobby Zamora and Clint Dempsey doing the damage.

This was the latest blow in a miserable season for Juventus, who are currently fifth in Serie A and now have no chance of winning a trophy.

Fans have been vehemently against the post-Calciopoli regime, accusing them of incompetence and a group of fans took their unhappiness to a new level tonight. In the closing minutes, with Juve bowing out of Europe a large group of tifosi sang in unison: “Vattene Blanc e Secco” - translated “Go away Blanc and Secco”.

 ==========

Juventus Team Bus Pelted With Eggs By Angry Fans, Jonathan Zebina Slapped In The Face

The Juventus fans have expressed their dismay with the Turin side's disappointing performances...

Angry Juventus fans have pelted the team bus with eggs in the build-up toward the home match against Atalanta Bergamo. Additionally, defender Jonathan Zebina was slapped in the face by an 'alleged' fan of the Old Lady.

Dozens of Juventus tifosi were waiting for the players at the hotel where the team was preparing for Sunday's Serie A game. Fans started throwing eggs and other objects when the players entered the team bus. One of the supporters even took a swing at French defender Zebina.

According to Sky Sport Italia, the 31-year-old didn't react to the attack and entered the team bus without showing any reaction. Zebina had previously been the subject of fans' abuse after the lost Europa League match against Fulham.

Juventus have been in abysmal form this season and currently sit 'only' sixth in the league table. They lost the important away match against Napoli 3-1 in midweek.

 ==========

Football-Italia.net (http://football-italia.net/sa1011/juv-sam.html):

1st goal: "Juve turned the game around completely in chaotic fashion after the break. Krasic's cross found Gastaldello and only an acrobatic Gianluca Curci save prevented an own goal. Quagliarella's follow-up hit his teammate, but eventually Simone Pepe managed to bundle it over the line from a yard. However, replays suggest Pepe may well have been OFFSIDE."

2nd goal: It didn't last long, as Quagliarella made it 3-2 against another of his former clubs. In fairness, most of the credit goes to Pepe, who took on Zauri, nutmegged the defender to hit the base of the near post from eight yards and it was the easiest of tap-ins for Quagliagol. There were suspicions of OFFSIDE in the build-up."

Corriere dello Sport: "Gravi errori a Torino."

(http://www.corrieredellosport.it/calcio/moviola/2010/09/13-128610/Arbitri%2C+falsa+partenza%3A+%C3%A8+gi%C3%A0+caos): "Pepe e Quagliarella: che pasticci! Male Mazzoleni (non convince nella gestione disci­plinare del match), peggio di lui l'assistente numero due, Padovan: due dei tre gol della Juventus sono ir­regolari. Rimpallo Melo-Palombo, con il pallone che finisce a Pozzi, poi è bravissimo Storari: Pozzi è te­nuto in gioco da due giocatori juventini (uno è Bo­nucci). Irregolare la rete di Pepe: dopo la parata di Curci (su tiro di... Lucchini), Quagliarella tocca in avanti il pallone e Pepe è sul palo senza avere avver­sari tra sé e la linea di porta (a parte il portiere del­la Samp), quindi in off side. Sbaglia ancora Padovan visto che, al momento del tiro di Pepe (parato da Curci), Quagliarella è oltre Gastaldello, ultimo di­fensore blucerchiato."

Gazzetta dello Sport: "Da annullare il 2-1 e il 3-2 dei bianconeri Pepe e Quagliarella sono in FUOURIGIOCO."

 JUVE, LADRI D'ITALIA!!!

 ==========

 MOGGI AND THE LIES!!! (Note: this was written by a well-known journalist and also a Juve fan)

 Let's go on, because there are many lies which have been exposed during this week. Do you remember Calciopoli? It was all extremely clear when in 2005 the calls made by Moggi came out. Some months ago the lawyers of Moggi during Naples trial say: the magistrates and the Carabinieri have not used all the calls. Why? Because what Moggi did everyone did in reality, even those who proclaimed themselves victims of the cupola of Calciopoli. Facchetti did the same and (the lawyers of Moggi) revealed clamorously a call between Facchetti and Bergamo, in which, the lawyers of Moggi say, Facchetti told Bergamo “put in Collina”, the referee whom, according to Moggi's lawyers, Facchetti wanted to impose to Bergamo, clearly because Collina was favorable to Inter. Someone said: Facchetti did it in order to defend himself from the cupola, but the real question is: did Facchetti really said that sentence?, because if Facchetti said it then Inter have to be prosecuted exactly the way the other clubs involved in Calciopoli were prosecuted. Proving that Facchetti is guilty doesn't prove that Moggi is innocent though. If ever we have two people who are guilty, we have one more person who is guilty. Instead Moggi wanted to use it in order to say: Facchetti did it as well, then I'm innocent. This is the theorem which is usually applied with Berlusconi and Craxi in the past: if I'm a thief but I can prove that there is another thief, then we are not two thieves, we are both not thief! This is not how things really should work, but if it could be proved that Facchetti has asked for and obtained, but even just asked for, a referee to the designator, it would mean that he had, at least once, done what Moggi always did, and Inter should be, proportionally, prosecuted.

All this mess all of a sudden stopped, we didn't hear anything about it any more, in the meanwhile the trial was going on even if the newspapers told us nothing and the people knew nothing about it. What happened then? It happened that the Court asked an expert to listen again to that particular call in order to certify whether the lawyers of Moggi were right and even Inter had to be prosecuted because of what Facchetti said. The son of Facchetti had already said: no, that was not my father's voice, it was clearly Bergamo who said that thing about Collina and not my father, whose voice I recognize. But they didn't trust him and said: it's Facchetti's son, he defends the memory of his father and can't be trusted. So the expert sent by the Court verified and what did he verify? That it was Bergamo who said that thing and not Facchetti. So all the mess created by Moggi and his trumpeters, who are many yet, on the various newspapers, was based on something which is false, they have slandered a dead man. How? Simply by inverting the sentences and attributing to him a thing Bergamo had said. Of course, (after this discovery) there has not been the same clamour which there had been before (when the newspapers said that it was Facchetti who said 'put in Collina'), so there are many people, even in good faith, who believe that Moggi is harassed by the lobby of the magistrates, allied with Inter. It is not clear for what reason magistrates from Naples should be allies of Inter, but there are lots of people, even in good faith, who believe there is a conspiracy, because they have no chance to see a larger scenario and so everyone simply trust his fav club. Some (many, I say) juventini think that Juventus are victims of a conspiracy. Why? Simply because they were not given the means to understand that the management of Juventus in that era, the Moggi-Giraudo era, was a management which was polluted by the permanent and steady sporting illicit act. A juventino, who knows the facts and feels shame for what his fav club did, says it.